珊瑚:海洋工程师面临威胁

corail - coraux - ocean - encyclopedie environnement

  珊瑚礁是地球上最复杂、最丰富的生态系统之一。该生态系统基于珊瑚构建的生物矿物结构,这一结构为许多在珊瑚礁中觅食和寻求保护的物种提供了生态位。珊瑚礁的成功得益于珊瑚(宿主)与单细胞藻类共生藻(虫黄藻)建立的共生关系,珊瑚因而能在营养贫乏的热带水域生存。这种互惠共生需要两个伙伴建立适应机制,为适应彼此的需要,它们不得不做出调整。尽管有这些适应性,共生关系的平衡依旧脆弱,且极其依赖环境条件。珊瑚受到高温等巨大压力时,平衡会遭受破坏,虫黄藻会被宿主排出,导致珊瑚白化,最终死亡。目前,珊瑚礁的健康和珊瑚的共生平衡面临诸多威胁。全球范围内,由于全球变暖和海洋酸化,环境的物理和化学变化也会影响珊瑚礁。除这些变化外,还有人类活动的影响,如污染、过度捕捞和不可持续的旅游业。尽管珊瑚具有适应能力,但观察和模型预测到2050年,世界上超过90%的珊瑚礁将受重大白化事件影响。这些数字表明,亟待采取行动保护这一独特生态系统,这对许多国家的经济至关重要。

1.珊瑚礁:生物多样性的热点

1.1形成、分布和重要性

环境百科全书-生命-珊瑚
图1.珊瑚礁的地理分布。
30°N和30°S区域用粉色标出,这些点标志着珊瑚礁的位置。[摘自oceanservice.noaa.gov公共领域网站]

  珊瑚礁由能合成碳酸钙(CaCO3)骨架的动物所建:造礁石珊瑚。随着漫长的地质演进,珊瑚已成为由活体生物建造的最大固体结构。目前最大的珊瑚礁结构是大堡礁,长度2600km,总面积约34.4万km²。

  法国拥有世界上近10%的珊瑚礁,包括长达1600km的新喀里多尼亚珊瑚礁。珊瑚礁主要分布在北纬30°和南纬30°之间,周围赤道带的热带和亚热带地区(图1)。大多数珊瑚礁深度在0到30m深,但在世界上一些地区,如红海,因光线穿透力强,珊瑚礁深度可达100m以上。

  珊瑚礁约占海床的0.16%(约60万km²)和海岸底部的10.8%。尽管珊瑚礁生态系统面积小,但却是主要生态保护区,目前已知约30%的海洋生物多样性都存在其间[1],包括1/4已明确的鱼类[2]。珊瑚礁被称为最丰富的海洋生态系统,经常和陆地上的热带森林比较。

除生态上的重要性,珊瑚礁还为人类提供重要的生态系统服务。它们位于100多个国家的海岸边缘,对其人民的作用至关重要。它们极高的生物多样性促进了这些国家的经济发展,如渔业活动、旅游业和提供建筑材料。它们也在保护海岸免受侵蚀和风暴、飓风的侵袭,且贡献颇多[3]。总计有5亿多人的生命与珊瑚礁提供的服务直接相关。珊瑚礁提供的净利润(包括渔业、海岸保护和生物多样性)从每年300亿美元[3]到每年3750亿美元[4]不等。

1.2珊瑚礁的功能,珊瑚的重要作用

环境百科全书-生命-珊瑚
图2.珊瑚,珊瑚礁的保护和营养来源。
鹿角珊瑚Acropora sp.,鱼类避难所(A),捕食珊瑚的鹦鹉鱼(鹦嘴鱼科Scaridae)(B),鹦鹉鱼在滨珊瑚Porites sp.上留下的痕迹(C),鹿角珊瑚Acropora sp.群体的黏液排泄(D)。照片:A、B、C©乔尔.库蒂亚尔(J. Courtial);D© A.迪亚斯莫塔(A. Dias Mota)

  珊瑚生态系统围绕珊瑚矿物框架形成生态位,为许多生物提供栖息地。栖息地的物理结构取决于珊瑚钙质骨架,对相关生物多样性和生态系统功能有着深远影响。它越复杂,就越有利于物种的共存和分化,抵御捕食者(图2A)和天气干扰,以及促进幼鱼的繁殖和发育。因此,鱼类和珊瑚礁无脊椎动物的丰富度、密度和生物量与珊瑚形成的建筑复杂性直接相关。

  除作为骨架外,珊瑚也是珊瑚礁的营养来源。事实上,许多鱼类以珊瑚为食,因此被称为食珊瑚动物(图2B,C)。例如,一些雀鲷、虾虎鱼、蝴蝶鱼或鹦嘴鱼。

  此外,珊瑚分泌的黏液是珊瑚礁中有机物的主要来源。这些黏液主要由碳水化合物和蛋白质组成,分散在水体中,供其他珊瑚礁生物使用(图2D)。珊瑚分泌的有机物对珊瑚礁的功能至关重要,因其促进底栖生产(在海洋底栖区生产,或在公海浮游区生产)、参与珊瑚礁[5]寡营养水体[6]中必需元素(氮、磷…)的再循环。

2.造礁珊瑚

2.1造礁石珊瑚、共生动物

环境百科全书-生命-珊瑚
图3.不同尺度的珊瑚。
萼柱珊瑚Stylophora pistillata的群体(A),萼柱珊瑚的珊瑚虫(B),萼柱珊瑚的珊瑚虫富含虫黄藻的触手(C)。珊瑚虫(D)和含有共生菌Symbiodinium的口腔组织(E)示意图。在珊瑚虫(D)内,口延伸至食管(造口管),开口进入腔肠(腔肠体)。珊瑚虫由两个组织分隔:与海水直接接触的口腔组织和与菌落骨架接触的口腔组织。两个组织中的每一个都由两个细胞层组成,即组织外表面的表皮和组织内表面的胃粘膜。它们由一个称为中胶层(E)的非细胞层分离。构成珊瑚虫和腔肠体的一组细胞层延伸到菌落中,形成一个将珊瑚虫连接在一起的组织,称为共肉组织。[图片来源:A,B-照片©E.坦布特(E.Tambutte),D-改编自坦布特(Tambutte)等人,2007年,Coral Reefs 26,517-529,E-改编自冯尼福斯(Kvennefors)等人,2010年,Dev. Immunol.Comp.34,1219-1229]。

  造礁珊瑚或石珊瑚目(Scleractinian)的珊瑚属于刺胞动物门,也包括水母、海葵或柳珊瑚。其最古老的化石出现于前寒武纪,可追溯至7亿年前。“现代”珊瑚礁出现在大约2亿年前的三叠纪时期,可能是珊瑚和一种单细胞藻类(通常称为虫黄藻)间互惠关系(共生)发展的结果。(参阅共生和寄生

  珊瑚一般为群居动物,即它们通过一群叫做珊瑚虫的个体中进行群体生活(图3A,B),这些珊瑚虫通过一个共同腔体(称为消化腔或肠腔)和一个共同的神经网络相互连接。后者提供感觉和运动功能,如在压力下控制息肉开放或收缩。每个珊瑚虫都有称为“口”的单孔,具备进食和排泄功能。口部周围环绕着由6根触须组成的冠状触手(因此得名六放珊瑚亚纲),既可用于捕食,又可用于防御。关于珊瑚解剖的更多细节,请参考图3。

  首次描述这些藻类时,人们认为与珊瑚共生的藻,即虫黄藻,都属于同一物种——浮游鞭毛藻(Symbiodinium microadriaticum)。分子分析技术的发展证明,它们有可能构成了一个属——共生藻属(Symbiodinium),其中包含一个大的种或亚种的复合体,而这些种或亚种在分类学上尚未得到解决。[7]

  珊瑚(宿主)和虫黄藻的共生关系互惠互利,双方都从这种关系中受益(下文详述)。实际上,虫黄藻是整合到宿主细胞中(见图3E),这被称为细胞内共生。每个珊瑚平均每平方厘米的组织表面积含100万个虫黄藻。这一密度实属惊人,也是珊瑚颜色的主要成因。

2.1.1共生的好处

  虫黄藻对珊瑚的作用主要是提供营养。事实上,虫黄藻的光合作用为珊瑚提供了多种碳水化合物(以碳水化合物、氨基酸和脂质的形式)。大多数光合作用产物(75%-95%)被转移到宿主体内,宿主利用这些产物进行呼吸和新陈代谢,以及产生黏液。因此,虫黄藻可以满足宿主高达100%的能量需求。珊瑚因此从异养生物状态(通过异养营养利用有机碳源)转变为混合营养生物状态(通过异养利用有机碳,通过虫黄藻光合作用利用无机碳)[8]

  由于虫黄藻的光合特性,其光合作用产生的氧气是宿主(当然也包括虫黄藻自身)呼吸作用的主要来源。最后,虫黄藻产生关键防御分子,如霉菌素样氨基酸(或MAAs)——真正的太阳滤光片,进而参与防御有害光辐射(如紫外线辐射)。

  对虫黄藻而言,群居也有很多好处。由于位于细胞内,虫黄藻受益于不受捕食的环境、动物细胞质的稳定性。虫黄藻也从宿主代谢废物中获取氮和磷,从动物直接代谢[9]中获取无机碳(CO2),从而能在营养普遍匮乏的环境中避免不必要的损失。然而,为确保最佳光合活性,珊瑚从外部环境吸收二氧化碳、氮和磷,积极参与这些化合物的供应。

  因此,珊瑚共生关系既帮助宿主新代谢,也有助于虫黄藻获得稳定环境和代谢所需元素。

2.1.2 共生的成本

  尽管共生优势明显,但也会给双方带来成本,受共同进化过程限制。例如,由于光合作用对光的需求,宿主只能在透光区生长,而暴露在高强度光下会导致严重的氧化应激。此外,虫黄藻产生的光合作用大部分转移至动物宿主体内,这一损失远大于游离藻类在环境中的损失(5%)。最后,虫黄藻的氧气供应的确是一种代谢优势,但也是一种化学限制,其原因在于强烈的组织高氧导致活性氧增加。因此,这种共生关系伴随着抗氧化防御(如酶,超氧化物歧化酶)的增强,从而有可能抵御有害物质。

2.1.3 珊瑚,一种共生功能体

  虽然说虫黄藻和珊瑚间的光合作用共生关系众所周知,但我们知道珊瑚也寄生着许多其他生物:细菌、古细菌、原生生物、真菌、病毒,所有这些生物组成了一个功能性群落,即共生功能体。构成这种微生物群的微生物分布在珊瑚的不同隔室,在特定物理化学条件下形成群落。组织、黏液、骨骼和消化腔之间的群落明显不同[10]。它们的作用多种多样,且取决于其所在隔间,但仍然鲜为人知。例如,在黏液中,纤毛虫通过产生约2mm/s的表面电流来阻止寄生生物附着。与黏液相关的细菌对其他致病细菌或病毒有保护作用[4],并通过降解珊瑚分泌的有机物参与共生功能体中营养物质的循环。在组织和骨骼中,蓝细菌(cyanobacteria)或其他固氮营养细菌进行氮的固定,是宿主和共生藻(Symbiodinium)的潜在氮源。这种氮源以及能固定大气氮的细菌(称为固氮营养菌)经光合作用合成的糖对共生功能体在白化条件下的生存至关重要。

2.2 从珊瑚到珊瑚礁,生物矿化

  珊瑚礁的物理结构由珊瑚虫钙化形成,即珊瑚虫利用海水中的Ca2+ 和 HCO3离子合成钙质骨架。这个过程称为生物控制矿化或生物矿化[11]。珊瑚骨架由文石晶体层(碳酸钙CaCO3结晶的一种形式)有组织地叠加而成,这些层插入主要由富含氨基酸和磷脂的蛋白质组成的有机基质中。有机基质使珊瑚能够对钙化进行生物控制,形成从纳米级到厘米级的骨骼形态。

  珊瑚具有广泛的表型可塑性,因为环境参数对骨骼形态有很大影响。在这些参数中,光起着关键作用。尤格(Yonge)和尼克尔森(Nicholls)[12]观察到光对珊瑚礁的形成至关重要,而这种联系可能依赖虫黄藻的光合作用。这一过程如今被称为光强化钙化(LEC或光刺激钙化)过程:在光照下,钙化率要乘以一个平均值为3的系数,但根据环境条件和物种的不同,这一系数可以达到127的极值 [12],[13]。光照一出现,这种刺激作用就会发生:例如,在实验室条件下,灯光开启25分种后,珊瑚的钙化率就会从夜间值变化到白天值。这种关系的内在机制仍然有很多争议。

  通过提供实现钙化所需的能量和氧气以及合成有机基质的前体,虫黄藻可以促进钙化。通过吸收光合作用所需的二氧化碳,虫黄藻还可以促进动物组织中pH值的增加,为钙化创造条件。最后,通过吸收一些有毒化合物,如磷酸盐,虫黄藻可以减少钙化抑制。值得一提的是,这些不同的假设并非排他性的,有几种假说可能共存[10]

3.珊瑚,环境变化中的生物体

环境百科全书-生命-珊瑚

  环境条件对珊瑚的发育和共生的正常运作至关重要。事实上,光照和温度条件改变时,宿主和虫黄藻的脆弱平衡可能会破坏。组织破裂会导致排出虫黄藻或损失光合色素。这种现象通常被称为白化,环境条件长时间出于恶劣状态会导致珊瑚死亡[14]。除这些环境参数的自然变化外,还有人类及其活动的影响。可以是地方性影响(富营养化、污染、沉积、不可持续的沿海开发、过度捕捞、过频捕捞等)或全球性影响(主要是全球变暖和海洋酸化)。

3.1全球变暖和珊瑚白化

  海洋温度的升高和全球变暖有关,会促进白化事件发生,致其规模和频率持续增加[14]。例如,2016年,一些地区记录到高达+3°C的海表温度异常,并导致世界各地珊瑚严重白化。就在2017年,大堡礁还遭受大规模白化影响。

  温度是一个重要的环境参数,因其控制珊瑚的新陈代谢和生长。事实上,生物的大部分化学反应都由酶催化,而酶的活性主要取决于温度。低温下酶的活性最低,然后酶活性上升直至最适的温度,超过这个温度后酶活性被抑制。因此,光合作用、呼吸作用和钙化作用随温度线性上升,达到一个最佳值,然后下降,而最佳值通常取决于所研究的物种。

温度的有利影响和有害影响之间的界限很窄。事实上,除抑制代谢酶以外,温度超过一定值(因珊瑚种类而异)还会改变光合作用,产生过量自由基,增加细胞内氧化应激[15]

环境百科全书-生命-珊瑚
图5.过热对共生的影响的图。
(A)在常温下,由光合作用和呼吸作用形成的活性氧(ROS)被抗氧化防御所中和,从而限制了氧化应激。(B)在高温下,光合作用和呼吸作用蛋白的变性导致活性氧的产生增加,并阻止其中和。虫黄菌中形成的部分ROS向动物细胞扩散,并加入线粒体功能障碍产生的ROS中。氧化应激增加,导致细胞损伤,最终导致珊瑚白化。闪电符合表示过热对蛋白质的影响(B)。
(图5:Animal cell 动物细胞;Zooxanthella 虫黄藻;Nucleus 细胞核; Anti oxidant denfence 抗氧化防御系统;Thylakoid 类囊体;ROS(Reactive oxygen species) 活性氧;Chloroplast 叶绿体;Oxidative stress氧化应激;Mitochondria 线粒体;Hyperthermia 过热;Defenses anti oxydantes 抗氧化剂的防御性;Cellular damages 细胞损伤;Apoptosis animal cell 动物细胞凋亡;Xooxanthalla explusion 虫黄藻爆炸;Bleaching 白化。)

  为减少热压力造成的损害,珊瑚会合成伴侣蛋白,即热激蛋白(HSP),该蛋白可以保护细胞免受压力影响,维持相关蛋白质的功能。例如,它们保护电子载体免受光合作用和呼吸作用的影响,从而限制氧化应激。

  在不得已的情况下,热压力过高,珊瑚无法抑制氧化压力时,它们会大量排出虫黄藻,导致珊瑚大规模白化(或大规模白化事件)。如果压力持续存在,共生体的数量无法维持珊瑚主要功能,群落就会死亡(温度效应概述,见图5)。因此,过高的温度会导致珊瑚白化和高死亡率[16]

3.2 海洋酸化

  虽然绝大部分人类活动产生的二氧化碳积聚在大气中,导致温室效应从而引起全球变暖,但也有一些会溶解在海洋中。这种溶解会引起海洋环境的化学变化,称为海洋酸化,或二氧化碳的另一效应。事实上,二氧化碳溶解在海洋中会导致海水pH值下降,具体取决于反应:

 CO+ H2O ↔ HCO3 + H+(反应1)(其中HCO3是碳酸氢盐H+是氢酸离子)

  因此,自工业时代以来,海洋酸度增加了30%(pH值从8.2下降到8.1,到本世纪末可能达到7.8),而过去3000万年中,pH值几乎保持不变。海洋酸化导致碳酸盐发生化学变化,这一化学系统非常复杂,对平衡海水和所有生物体液的pH值以及沉积岩的形成至关重要。事实上,碳酸盐离子(CO32-)是形成贝壳和其他无脊椎动物骨骼的基本材料,包括珊瑚的骨骼,当其与钙反应(反应2)形成碳酸钙(CaCO3或石灰石):

CO32- + Ca2+ ↔ CaCO3 (反应2)

  当海水酸度增加时,过量产生的质子(H+)会按照反应3与碳酸盐离子发生反应:

H+ + CO32- ↔ HCO3 (反应3)

  因此,海洋酸化降低了海水中碳酸盐的浓度,同时增加了碳酸氢盐的浓度。长期以来,一致认为这种降低是实验室或野外酸化条件下观察到的钙化率下降的原因。目前可以明确,造成海洋酸化生物效应的主要机制是pH值的下降。事实上,pH是生物体生理学的关键参数,因其能调节许多细胞过程,包括多种蛋白质活动。

  海洋酸化对生物的影响包括减少钙化破坏生殖、营养等生理过程

  然而,研究表明,生物对海洋酸化的敏感性差异很大,尤其是珊瑚。对巴布亚新几内亚等地暴露在自然二氧化碳下的珊瑚礁研究表明,团块状珊瑚抵抗很强, 至少在pH值低于7.7的环境下,而枝状珊瑚则非常敏感[17]如果说在一个酸性更强的世界里有胜利者和失败者,那么珊瑚礁的形态将因珊瑚生物多样性的减少和藻类覆盖面积的增加[17]而遭到严重破坏。

  此外,实验室研究表明尽管一些珊瑚物种可能抵抗酸化,但由于其长度增长没有减少,这些珊瑚群的骨架会更加多孔,导致分枝更加脆弱,这表明珊瑚礁的未来一片黑暗。

3.3 当前形势的挑战:在焦虑和希望之间

  考虑到全球变暖,最近的观测和模型预测,如果到2100年全球变暖控制在1.5至2℃(COP21设定的目标[18]),21世纪中叶,90%的珊瑚礁将消失或发生重大变化。此外,海洋酸化和海洋富营养化等其他因素加剧了全球变暖的负面影响。

  然而,最近的研究显示,珊瑚有可能在生理上适应强烈的温度异常。例如,一些物种能够改变其虫黄藻种群并调控基因表达,以加强防御机制、优化对高温的抗性。另一些则能够通过增加异养营养补偿减少的光合作用。然而,这种恢复能力仍然很低且有限,珊瑚的适应/适应能力仍备受争议。

  对珊瑚礁未来的预测令人担忧,人们开始意识到需要采取行动保护珊瑚礁。科学家、非政府组织(NGOS)和当地政府必须共同努力保护这一遗产。有效保护珊瑚礁生物多样性取决于我们是否有能力减少对环境的影响,改善当地居民生活条件,使其能可持续利用赖以生存的生态系统资源。

 


参考资料和注释:

封面图片[来自:©乔尔-库蒂亚尔(Joël Courtial)]

[1] Porter and Tougas (2001, In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity) estimate that 93,000 species are described in reefs out of a total of 274,000 known marine species.

[2] Allsopp, M., Pambuccian, S.E., Johnston, P. & Santillo, D. State of the World’s Oceans. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008).

[3] Cesar, H.S.J. Coral reefs: their functions, threats and economic value. (2002).

[4] Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260 (1997).

[5] An oligotrophic environment is one that is poor in the nutrients necessary for the growth of marine organisms.

[6] Bythell, J. C. & Wild, C. Biology and ecology of coral mucus release. J. Exp. Mar. Organic. School. 408, 88-93 (2011).

[7] The genus Symbiodinium is now divided into 9 large phylogenetic groups, or clades, named A to I. Each of these clades is itself composed of many sub-classes, now estimated at more than 250.

[8] Houlbrèque, F. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. Heterotrophy in tropical scleractinian corals. Biol. Rev. 84, 1-17 (2009).

[9] Smith, D.C. & Douglas, A.E. The biology of symbiosis (Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., 1987).

[10] Bourne, D.G., Morrow, K.M. & Webster, N.S. Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu. Microbiol. 70, 317-340 (2016).

[11] Tambutté, S. et al. Coral biomineralization: from the gene to the environment. J. Exp. Mar. Organic. School. 408, 58-78 (2011).

[12] Yonge, C.M., Nicholls, A.G. Yonge, M.J. Studies on the physiology of corals. 1, (British Museum, 1931).

[13] Gattuso, J.-P., German, D. & Frankignoulle, M. Photosynthesis and calcification at cellular, organismal and community levels in coral reefs: a review on interactions and control by carbonate chemistry. Am. Zool. 39, 160–183 (1999).

[14] Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Tue. Freshw. Res. 50, 839-866 (1999).

[15] By degrading the protein complexes underlying, in particular, the electron transfer chains of mitochondria or chloroplasts, hyperthermia promotes the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (called ROS, for Reactive Oxygen Species) that are harmful to cells. An oxidative state has thus been demonstrated in corals subjected to hyperthermia.

[16] Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 1029-1136 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

[17] Fabricius, K.E. et al Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Nat. Air conditioning Chang. 1, 165-169 (2011).

[18] 2015 Paris Climate Conference.


环境百科全书由环境和能源百科全书协会出版 (www.a3e.fr),该协会与格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学和格勒诺布尔INP有合同关系,并由法国科学院赞助。

引用这篇文章: COURTIAL Lucile, ALLEMAND Denis, FURLA Paola (2024年2月23日), 珊瑚:海洋工程师面临威胁, 环境百科全书,咨询于 2024年12月25日 [在线ISSN 2555-0950]网址: https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/zh/vivant-zh/corals-ocean-engineers-under-threat/.

环境百科全书中的文章是根据知识共享BY-NC-SA许可条款提供的,该许可授权复制的条件是:引用来源,不作商业使用,共享相同的初始条件,并且在每次重复使用或分发时复制知识共享BY-NC-SA许可声明。

Corals: Ocean engineers are under threat

corail - coraux - ocean - encyclopedie environnement

Coral reefs are one of the most complex and richest ecosystems on our planet. They are based on a bioconstructed mineral (or biomineral) structure built by corals that provides ecological niches for many species that find food and protection there. The success of coral reefs is based on the symbiosis established by the coral (host) with unicellular algae of the genus Symbiodinium (zooxanthellae) which allows life in tropical waters very poor in nutrients. This mutualistic symbiosis has required the development of adaptation mechanisms between the two partners, forced to adjust to their mutual needs. Despite these adaptations, the balance of the symbiosis is fragile and strongly relies on environmental conditions. When the coral is subjected to high pressures such as high temperatures, the balance can be disrupted and the zooxanthellae expelled by the host, causing the coral to bleach and eventually leading to its death. Currently, there are many threats to coral reefs health and the symbiotic balance of corals. On a global scale, reefs are subject to physical and chemical changes in their environment due to global warming and ocean acidification. In addition to these changes, there are local pressures related to human activities such as pollution, overfishing and unsustainable tourism. Despite the adaptive capacities of corals, observations and models predict that more than 90% of the world’s reefs will be affected by major bleaching episodes by 2050. These figures demonstrate the urgency and need for action to preserve this unique ecosystem, which is essential to the economies of many countries.

1. Coral reefs: biodiversity hot spots

1.1. Formation, distribution and importance

recifs - coralliens - monde - carte - schema - encyclopedie environnement
Figure 1. Geographical distribution of coral reefs. The 30°N and 30°S zone is highlighted in pink and the points mark the location of the reefs. [Adapted from the website oceanservice.noaa.gov, Public Domain]
Coral reefs are built by animal organisms that synthesize a calcium carbonate skeleton (CaCO3): Scleractinian corals. Over the course of geological time, corals have developed into the largest solid structures built by living organisms. The largest current reef structure is the Great Barrier Reef, measuring 2600 km in length and covering a total area of about 344,000 km2. France is home to nearly 10% of the world’s coral reefs, including the New Caledonia coral reef, which is 1600 km long. Coral reefs are mainly distributed between 30°N and 30°S, in tropical and subtropical areas around the equatorial belt (Figure 1). Most of them develop between 0 and 30 m deep, but they can reach depths of more than 100 m in some regions of the world such as the Red Sea, where light penetrates deeper.

Coral reefs represent about 0.16% of the seabed (about 600,000 km2) and 10.8% of the coastal bottom. Despite their small areas, reef ecosystems are major ecological reserves that are home to about 30% of the marine biodiversity known to date [1] including ¼ listed fish species [2]. They are defined as the richest marine ecosystem in terms of biodiversity and are often compared to their terrestrial equivalent: the tropical forest.

Beyond their ecological importance, coral reefs provide important ecosystem services to humans. Bordering the coasts of more than a hundred countries, they play an essential role for their populations. Their extreme biodiversity contributes to the economic development of these countries, through fishing activities, tourism and provision of building materials. They also play a role in protecting coasts against erosion, storms and cyclones [3]. In total, more than 500 million human lives are directly linked to the services provided by coral reefs. The net benefits provided by coral reefs (taking into account fisheries, coastal protection and biodiversity) vary according to estimates from $30 billion per year [3] to $375 billion per year [4].

1.2. Reef functioning, the key role of coral

Figure 2. Corals, a protection and source of nutrition for the reef. Acropora sp., refuge for a fish (A), parrot fish (Scaridae) that grazes coral (B), traces left by parrot fish on a colony of Porites sp. (C), mucus excretion by a colony of Acropora sp. (D). [Photos: A, B, C © J. Courtial; D © A. Dias Mota.]
The coral ecosystem is formed around the coral mineral framework that forms ecological niches providing habitat for many species. The physical structure of the habitat, defined by all the forms taken by the calcareous skeleton of corals, has a profound influence on the associated biodiversity and the functioning of the ecosystem. The more complex it is, the more it facilitates the coexistence and division of species, protection from predators (Figure 2A) and weather disturbances, and the reproduction and development of young fish (juveniles). Therefore, the richness, abundance and biomass of fish and reef invertebrates are directly related to the architectural complexity formed by corals.

Beyond its role as a framework, coral is also a source of nutrition in the reef. Indeed, many fish species graze coral and are therefore referred to as corallivores (Figure 2B,C). This is the case, for example, for some damselfish, gobies, butterfly fish or parrot fish.

In addition, coral is also a major source of organic matter in the reef through mucus excretion. This mucus, composed mainly of carbohydrates and proteins, is then dispersed in the water column and can be used by other reef organisms (Figure 2D). Organic matter excreted by coral is essential to the functioning of the reef because it supports benthopelagic production (production in benthic areas, at the bottom of the sea, or pelagic, in the open ocean) and participates in the recycling of essential elements (nitrogen, phosphorus…) in the very oligotrophic water [5] of the reef [6].

2. Reef-building corals

2.1. Scleractinian corals, symbiotic animals

Reef-building corals, or corals of the order Scleractinian belong to the Cnidaria branch, which also includes jellyfish, sea anemones or gorgonians. Appeared in the Precambrian, the oldest fossils identified are dated to -700 million years ago. The “modern” reefs appeared in the Triassic period about 200 million years ago, probably as a result of the development of a mutualist association (symbiosis) between coral and a type of unicellular algae commonly known as zooxanthella (see Symbiosis and parasitism).

Figure 3. Coral at different scales. Colony of Stylophora pistillata (A), polyps of S. pistillata (B), zooxanthelle-rich tentacle of a polyp of S. pistillata (C). Schematic diagram of a polyp (D) and the oral tissue in which the Symbiodinium (E) is contained. Inside the polyp (D), the orifice extends into an œsophageal canal (stomodeum) opening into the gastrovascular cavity (cœlenteron). The polyp is delimited by two tissues: the oral tissue, in direct contact with seawater, and the aboral tissue, in contact with the skeleton of the colony. Each of the two tissues is composed of two cellular layers, the epidermis on the outer surface of the tissue and the gastroderma on the inner surface of the tissue. They are separated by an acellular layer called mesoglea (E). The set of cellular layers composing the tissues of the polyp and the cœlenteron extend into the colony and form a tissue that connects the polyps together called the cœnosarc. [Source: A, B – Photographs © E. Tambutté, D – adapted from Tambutté et al. 2007, Coral Reefs 26, 517-529, E – adapted from Kvennefors et al. 2010, Dev. Immunol. Comp. 34, 1219-1229]
Corals are mainly colonial animals, i.e. they live in colonies of individuals called polyps (Figure 3A,B) connected to each other by a common cavity, called a gastrovascular cavity or cœlenteron, and by a common nervous network. It provides sensory and motor functions, such as opening polyps or contracting them under stress. Each polyp is composed of a single orifice, called the mouth, which performs both nutritional and excretion functions. The mouth is surrounded by a crown of multiples of 6 tentacles (hence the name of the Hexacorallia subclass) used both for nutrition and defence. For more details on coral anatomy, see Figure 3.

When they were first described, it was thought that the algae associated with coral, zooxanthellae, all belonged to a single species, Symbiodinium microadriaticum. The development of molecular analysis techniques has made it possible to demonstrate that they constitute a genus, Symbiodinium, containing a large complexity of species or subspecies that has not yet been resolved in terms of taxonomy [7].

The symbiosis between coral (host) and zooxanthellae is mutualistic because both partners benefit from the association (developed below). Zooxanthellae are actually integrated into the host cells (see Figure 3E), this is called intracellular endosymbiosis. Each coral contains an average of 1 million zooxanthellae per cm2 of tissue surface area. This density is remarkable and is largely responsible for the colour of the coral.

2.1.1. Benefits of symbiosis

The role of zooxanthellae for coral is mainly trophic. Indeed, by providing a variety of carbon compounds (in the form of carbohydrates, amino acids and lipids) to the host, photosynthesis of zooxanthellae is a major source of carbon for coral. Most of the products of photosynthesis (75-95%) are thus transferred to the host, which uses them mainly for its own respiration and metabolism, as well as for mucus production. Zooxanthellae can thus contribute up to 100% of the host’s energy needs. Coral thus passes from a heterotrophic organism status (use of organic carbon sources via heterotrophic nutrition) to a mixotrophic organism status (use of both organic carbon via heterotrophy and inorganic carbon via zooxanthellae photosynthesis [8]).

Inherent to the photosynthetic properties of zooxanthellae, the oxygen produced by photosynthesis is an important source for host’s (and of course its zooxanthellae) respiration. Finally, zooxanthellae participate in defences against harmful light radiation (such as ultraviolet radiation) by producing key defence molecules such as Mycosporin-like amino acid (or MAAs), true sun filters.

For zooxanthellae, living in an association also has many advantages. Due to their intracellular location, zooxanthellae benefit from an environment protected from grazing and the stability of the animal cytoplasm. Zooxanthellae also benefit from nitrogen and phosphorus from the recycling of the host’s metabolic waste and inorganic carbon (CO2) produced directly by animal metabolism [9], thus avoiding any unnecessary loss in a generally nutrient-poor environment. Nevertheless, to ensure optimal photosynthetic activity, coral actively participates in the supply of CO2, nitrogen and phosphorus by absorbing these compounds from the external environment.

Thus, coral symbiosis is an association that benefits both the host, which acquires a new metabolic capacity, and zooxanthellae, which benefit from a stable environment and constant access to the elements necessary for their metabolism.

2.1.2. Costs of symbiosis

Despite its important advantages, symbiosis also imposes a cost on both partners and leads to co-evolution processes to limit them. For example, because of its light requirements for photosynthesis, the host is forced to develop only in the euphotic zone where exposure to high light intensities can cause significant oxidative stress. In addition, most of the photosynthesis produced by zooxanthellae is transferred to the animal host, which is a loss much greater than the 5% lost in the environment by free algae. Finally, the oxygen supply from zooxanthellae is certainly a metabolic advantage, but it is also a chemical constraint caused by the consequences of strong tissue hyperoxia leading to an increased production of reactive oxygen species. The symbiosis has thus been accompanied by an increase in antioxidant defences (such as enzymes such as superoxides dismutases) that make it possible to counter its harmful agents.

2.1.3. The coral, a holobionte

If the phototrophic symbiosis between zooxanthellae and coral remains the most well known, we now know that coral also hosts many other organisms: bacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, viruses, all of which form a functional community called holobionte. The microorganisms constituting this microbiota are distributed in communities that develop in different compartments of the coral with particular physicochemical conditions. There are distinct communities between tissues, mucus, skeleton and gastro-vascular cavity [10]. Their role, still little known, seems varied and depends again on the compartment in which they are located. For example, in mucus, ciliates prevent the fixation of parasitic organisms by creating a surface current of about 2 mm.s-1. Bacteria associated with mucus have a protective role against other pathogenic bacteria or viruses [4] and participate in the recycling of nutrients in the holobionte by degrading the organic matter excreted by the coral. In tissues and skeleton, cyanobacteria, or other diazotrophic bacteria, carry out the fixation of dinitrogen, constituting a potential source of nitrogen for the host and Symbiodinium. This nitrogen source as well as sugars synthesized by photosynthesis of bacteria capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen (called diazotrophs) can be of great importance for the survival of the holobionte under bleaching conditions.

2.2. From coral to reef, biomineralization

The physical structure of coral reefs is formed by the polyps of corals that carry out calcification, i.e. they synthesize a calcareous skeleton from the Ca2+ and HCO3 ions of seawater. This process is called biologically-controlled mineralization or biomineralization [11]. Coral skeleton consists of the organized superposition of layers of aragonite crystals (a form of crystallization of calcium carbonate CaCO3) inserted into an organic matrix consisting mainly of proteins rich in acid amino acids and phospholipids. The organic matrix allows the coral to exercise biological control over calcification, imposing skeletal morphology from nanoscale to centimetre scale.

Corals have a wide phenotypic plasticity explained by the strong influence of environmental parameters on skeletal morphology. Among these parameters, light plays a key role. Yonge & Nicholls [12] had observed that light was essential for the formation of reefs and that this link could depend on the photosynthesis of zooxanthellae. This process is now known as the process of Light-Enhanced Calcification (LEC): in light, the calcification rate is multiplied by a factor of 3 on average, but this factor can reach extreme values of 127 depending on environmental conditions and species [12],[13]. This stimulation takes place as soon as light appears: in laboratory conditions, for example, 25 minutes after the lamps are switched on, the calcification rate of the coral changes from its night value to its day value. The mechanism(s) underlying this relationship remains much debated.

Zooxanthellae could promote calcification by providing the energy and oxygen necessary for its realization as well as precursors for the synthesis of the organic matrix. By absorbing the carbon dioxide required for photosynthesis, they could also promote an increase in pH in the animal’s tissues, thus creating favourable conditions for calcification. Finally, by absorbing some toxic compounds such as phosphates, they could reduce calcification inhibition. It should be noted that these different hypotheses are not exclusive and that several may coexist [10].

3. Corals, organisms in a changing environment

corail - stylophora pistillata - polype - ocean - encyclopedie environnement
Figure 4. Colonies of Acropora muricata bleached in Mayotte, in January 2002 (A), coral bleaching in New-Caledonia in March 2016 (B). [Photos A and B, © J. Courtial]
Environmental conditions play a crucial role in the development of corals and the proper functioning of symbiosis. Indeed, the fragile balance between host and zooxanthellae can be disrupted when light and temperature conditions change. The rupture results in the expulsion of zooxanthellae or the loss of photosynthetic pigments. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as bleaching and can lead to coral death when environmental conditions remain poor for too long [14]. In addition to the natural variability of these environmental parameters, there are pressures induced by the presence of humans and their activities. These pressures are local (eutrophication, pollution, sedimentation, unsustainable coastal development, overfishing, over-fishing, over-frequentation, etc.) or global (mainly global warming and ocean acidification).

3.1. Global warming and coral bleaching

The increase in ocean temperature, linked to global warming, favours bleaching episodes whose magnitude and frequency increase [14]. In 2016, for example, surface temperature anomalies of up to +3°C in some regions were recorded and caused severe episodes of coral bleaching around the world. As recently as 2017, massive bleaching affected the Great Barrier Reef.

Temperature is an essential environmental parameter because it controls the metabolism and growth of corals. Indeed, most of the body’s chemical reactions are catalysed by enzymes whose activity depends mainly on temperature. Enzyme activity is minimal at low temperatures and then increases to a temperature optimum above which it is then inhibited. Therefore, photosynthesis, respiration and calcification increase linearly with temperature, to an optimum that very often depends on the species studied, before decreasing again.

The boundary between the beneficial and harmful effects of temperature is narrow. Indeed, in addition to inhibiting metabolic enzymes, temperature can, above a certain value (variable according to coral species), alter photosynthetic activity and produce excess free radicals, increasing oxidative stress [15] in cells.

Figure 5. Diagram showing the effects of hyperthermia on symbiosis. At normal temperature (A), reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed by photosynthesis and respiration are neutralized by antioxidant defences, limiting oxidative stress. At high temperature (B), the denaturation of the proteins of photosynthesis and respiration leads to an increase in the production of ROS and blocks their neutralization. Some of the ROS formed in the zooxanthella diffuse towards the animal cell and are added to the ROS produced by the mitochondrial dysfunction. Oxidative stress increases and causes cellular damage that ultimately leads to coral bleaching. The effects of hyperthermia on proteins are symbolized by lightning flashes (B).

To limit the damage caused by thermal stress, corals synthesize chaperone proteins, called heat shock proteins (HSP), which protect cells from the effect of stress and maintain the function of the proteins with which they are associated. For example, they protect the function of electron transporters from photosynthesis and respiration, thus limiting oxidative stress.

As a last resort, when thermal stress is too high and corals are no longer able to contain oxidative stress, they massively expel zooxanthellae, leading to massive coral bleaching (or mass bleaching event). If stress persists, the amount of symbionts is no longer sufficient for the coral to maintain its primary functions and the colony dies (for a summary of temperature effects, see Figure 5). Too high a temperature is therefore responsible for bleaching and high mortality on reefs [16].

3.2. Ocean acidification

While a large part of anthropogenic carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere, causing global warming as a result of the greenhouse effect, some of it dissolves in the oceans. This dissolution induces a chemical modification of the marine environment called ocean acidification, or the other effect of CO2. Indeed, by dissolving in the oceans, carbon dioxide causes a decrease in the pH of seawater depending on the reaction:

CO2 + H2O ↔ HCO3 + H+ (reaction 1)

(where HCO3 is bicarbonate and H+ is hydrogen acid ion)

The acidity of the oceans has thus increased by 30% since the beginning of the industrial era (pH drop from 8.2 to 8.1, which could reach 7.8 at the end of this century), while the pH has remained virtually unchanged over the past 30 million years. Ocean acidification causes a change in carbonate chemistry, a complex chemical system that plays a major role in the pH balance of seawater and all biological fluids as well as in the formation of sedimentary rocks. Indeed, carbonate ion (CO32-) is the essential brick for the formation of shells and other invertebrate skeletons, including the skeleton of corals when it reacts with calcium (reaction 2) to form calcium carbonate (CaCO3 or limestone):

CO32- + Ca2+ ↔ CaCO3 (reaction 2)

When the acidity of seawater increases, the protons (H+) produced in excess will react with the carbonate ion according to reaction 3:

H+ + CO32- ↔ HCO3 (reaction 3)

Thus, ocean acidification reduces the concentration of carbonates in seawater while increasing the concentration of bicarbonates. This reduction has long been thought to be the cause of the decrease in calcification rates observed in the laboratory or in the field under acidified conditions. It is now known that the main mechanism responsible for the biological effects of ocean acidification is the decrease in pH by itself. Indeed, pH is a key parameter in the physiology of organisms since it regulates many cellular processes, including the activity of many proteins.

Biological effects of ocean acidification include decreased calcification and disruption of physiological processes such as reproduction, nutrition, etc.

However, studies show a wide disparity in the sensitivity of organisms to ocean acidification, particularly in corals. The study of coral reefs exposed to natural sources of carbon dioxide, for example in Papua New Guinea, shows that massive corals resist well, at least up to a pH of 7.7, while branchy corals are very sensitive [17]. If it appears that there will be winners and losers in a more acidic world, the morphology of the reef will be strongly disrupted by the decrease in coral biodiversity and an increase in algal cover [17].

In addition, laboratory studies show that although some coral species may appear resistant to acidification, as their length growth is not reduced, the skeleton of these colonies is more porous, making the branches more fragile and suggesting a dark future for coral reefs.

3.3. The challenges of the current situation: between anxiety and hope

Recent observations and models that take into account global warming predict the loss – or significant alteration – of 90% of reefs by the middle of the 21st century if global warming is limited to 1.5-2°C by 2100 (target set at COP21 [18]). In addition, ocean acidification and other environmental factors such as ocean eutrophication increase the negative effects of global warming.

However, recent studies have shown the potential for physiological acclimatization of corals to strong temperature anomalies. For example, some species are able to modify their zooxanthellae population and regulate gene expression to strengthen defence mechanisms and optimize their resistance to high temperatures. Others are able to compensate for the decrease in photosynthesis by increasing their heterotrophic nutrition. However, this degree of resilience remains low and limited, and coral adaptation/acclimation capacities remain highly debated.

Alarming predictions about the future of coral reefs have triggered an awareness for the need to act protecting them. Scientists, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and local authorities must work together to preserve this heritage. The effective protection of coral reef biodiversity depends, among other things, on our ability to reduce our impact on the environment and on improving the living conditions of local populations so that they can sustainably manage the resources of the ecosystems on which they depend.

 


References and notes

Cover image. [Source: © Joël Courtial]

[1] Porter and Tougas (2001, In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity) estimate that 93,000 species are described in reefs out of a total of 274,000 known marine species.

[2] Allsopp, M., Pambuccian, S.E., Johnston, P. & Santillo, D. State of the World’s Oceans. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008).

[3] Cesar, H.S.J. Coral reefs: their functions, threats and economic value. (2002).

[4] Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253-260 (1997).

[5] An oligotrophic environment is one that is poor in the nutrients necessary for the growth of marine organisms.

[6] Bythell, J. C. & Wild, C. Biology and ecology of coral mucus release. J. Exp. Mar. Organic. School. 408, 88-93 (2011).

[7] The genus Symbiodinium is now divided into 9 large phylogenetic groups, or clades, named A to I. Each of these clades is itself composed of many sub-classes, now estimated at more than 250.

[8] Houlbrèque, F. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. Heterotrophy in tropical scleractinian corals. Biol. Rev. 84, 1-17 (2009).

[9] Smith, D.C. & Douglas, A.E. The biology of symbiosis (Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., 1987).

[10] Bourne, D.G., Morrow, K.M. & Webster, N.S. Insights into the coral microbiome: underpinning the health and resilience of reef ecosystems. Annu. Microbiol. 70, 317-340 (2016).

[11] Tambutté, S. et al. Coral biomineralization: from the gene to the environment. J. Exp. Mar. Organic. School. 408, 58-78 (2011).

[12] Yonge, C.M., Nicholls, A.G. Yonge, M.J. Studies on the physiology of corals. 1, (British Museum, 1931).

[13] Gattuso, J.-P., German, D. & Frankignoulle, M. Photosynthesis and calcification at cellular, organismal and community levels in coral reefs: a review on interactions and control by carbonate chemistry. Am. Zool. 39, 160–183 (1999).

[14] Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Tue. Freshw. Res. 50, 839-866 (1999).

[15] By degrading the protein complexes underlying, in particular, the electron transfer chains of mitochondria or chloroplasts, hyperthermia promotes the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (called ROS, for Reactive Oxygen Species) that are harmful to cells. An oxidative state has thus been demonstrated in corals subjected to hyperthermia.

[16] Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis (ed. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 1029-1136 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

[17] Fabricius, K.E. et al Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Nat. Air conditioning Chang. 1, 165-169 (2011).

[18] 2015 Paris Climate Conference.


环境百科全书由环境和能源百科全书协会出版 (www.a3e.fr),该协会与格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学和格勒诺布尔INP有合同关系,并由法国科学院赞助。

引用这篇文章: COURTIAL Lucile, ALLEMAND Denis, FURLA Paola (2019年4月23日), Corals: Ocean engineers are under threat, 环境百科全书,咨询于 2024年12月25日 [在线ISSN 2555-0950]网址: https://www.encyclopedie-environnement.org/en/life/corals-ocean-engineers-under-threat/.

环境百科全书中的文章是根据知识共享BY-NC-SA许可条款提供的,该许可授权复制的条件是:引用来源,不作商业使用,共享相同的初始条件,并且在每次重复使用或分发时复制知识共享BY-NC-SA许可声明。